Editor:
The following is a reduced version of Joe Rommel’s blog.
David Eby’s recent housing legislation, aimed at tackling the housing crisis, advocates for small-scale, multi-unit housing by allowing for up to six-plexes on single building sites. While commendable, these changes warrant scrutiny to determine their impact on affordability and unintended consequences.
A primary concern lies in potential construction cost increases associated with intricate designs and processes for multi-unit housing. This could undermine affordability, as heightened costs might be transferred to homebuyers.
The legislation permits three to four units on lots zoned for single-family or duplex use, potentially driving up land demand and prices. Elevated development costs may challenge developers in providing affordable housing options.
While encouraging multi-unit housing, the legislation falls short in addressing single-family home affordability, thus maintaining demand and prices.
This type of urban density, while a solution for housing shortages, may lead to overcrowding, strained infrastructure, and reduced quality of life, therefore impacting property values.
Unlike traditional rezoning procedures, Eby’s density approach appears too streamlined, and without the requirement for public hearings, it neglects scrutiny on issues like increased traffic, parking and the much-needed infrastructure. This oversight raises concerns about poorly functioning future neighborhoods.
The legislation’s impact seems to also extend into established neighborhoods, potentially altering character and aesthetics, leading to resident resistance. Legal battles may ensue, slowing down housing construction.
Allowing six units near transit stops promotes transit-oriented development and risks concentrating development unevenly, making specific areas less desirable for a balanced living environment.
B.C..’s zoning approach, while hurriedly addressing the housing crisis, raises concerns about affordability, construction costs, and community impacts. A comprehensive, balanced approach considering diverse needs is essential for effective, lasting solutions.
Joe Rommel, Sechelt
